Claims

A large survey of medical and nursing students reported equal or higher motivation for exclusive e-learning than for classroom courses

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In one study of 2,520 medical and nursing students, 64.4% demonstrated an equal or higher motivational level to attend exclusive e-learning, and 65.5% reported equal or higher motivation for longer-duration e-learning. → Naciri Aziz A 2021

Evidence

Naciri Aziz A 2021

Naciri Aziz A, Radid M, Kharbach A, Chemsi G. (2021). E-learning in health professions education during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. J Educ Eval Health Prof. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.27

q2 · i? · review · r3

Single cross-sectional survey study (Puljak et al., 9 health science institutions, 2,520 medical and nursing students) narrated by the review; motivation was measured with a 2-item author-developed questionnaire. The review reports 64.4% showed "an equal or higher motivational level to attend exclusive e-learning".

"The first item focused on motivation to participate in online learning compared to classroom courses, and 64.4% of participants demonstrated an equal or higher motivational level to attend exclusive e-learning."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.