Year 4 students in major cities demonstrated one month's additional reading growth in 2020 compared with 2019¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Year 4 students in major cities demonstrated one month's additional growth in reading in 2020 (d = 0.08, p = 0.0472), with no significant differences in mathematics. → Gore 2021
Evidence¶
Gore 2021¶
Gore, J., Miller, A., Fray, L., Harris, J., & Prieto, E. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on student learning in New South Wales primary schools: an empirical study. The Australian Educational Researcher, 48, 605-637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-021-00436-w
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Linear mixed models by location found Year 4 major-city students' 2020 reading growth exceeded 2019 (d = 0.08, 95% CI = 0.00, 0.17, p = 0.0472). The study reports "one month's additional growth" using EEF standards, with no significant mathematics differences.
"Students in major cities demonstrated one month's additional growth (d = 0.08; 95% CI = 0.00, 0.17; p = 0.0472) in reading"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Year 3 and Year 4 student achievement growth in mathematics and reading showed no significant differences between 2019 and 2020 cohorts in NSW primary schools — related
- Year 3 regional students in mid-ICSEA schools demonstrated three months additional reading growth in 2020 compared with 2019 — related
- Year 3 students in mid-ICSEA schools achieved two months additional mathematics growth in 2020 compared with 2019 — related
- By spring 2021 students remained behind typical prepandemic achievement averages in both math and reading — related
- Year 3 students in low-ICSEA schools achieved significantly less mathematics growth in 2020, equivalent to two months less than the 2019 cohort — related
- No significant differences in achievement growth were identified for Indigenous students between 2019 and 2020 cohorts — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
covid19-year4-major-cities-one-month-additional-reading-growth |
title |
Year 4 students in major cities demonstrated one month's additional reading growth in 2020 compared with 2019 |
description |
Year 4 students in major cities demonstrated one month's additional reading growth in 2020 compared with 2019 |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — gore-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.