By spring 2021 students remained behind typical prepandemic achievement averages in both math and reading¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2027: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Students were 0.16 to 0.26 standard deviations behind typical prepandemic math averages by spring 2021. → Megan Kuhfeld 2022
q3 i? Students were 0.06 to 0.11 standard deviations behind typical prepandemic reading averages by spring 2021. → Megan Kuhfeld 2022
Evidence¶
Megan Kuhfeld 2022¶
Megan Kuhfeld, James Soland, Karyn Lewis, Erik Ruzek, Angela Johnson. (2022). The COVID-19 school year: Learning and recovery across 2020-2021. AERA Open, 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584221099306
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Achievement-trend modeling of test scores from 4.9 million U.S. students in Grades 3 through 8 compared 2020-2021 growth against prepandemic averages. The study reports students were "still behind typical (prepandemic) averages by spring 2021," with math deficits of 0.16 to 0.26 standard deviations and reading deficits of 0.06 to 0.11 standard deviations. These are descriptive standardized gaps, not printed effect sizes such as d or g, so impact is null.
"students were still behind typical (prepandemic) averages by spring 2021 (0.16 to 0.26 standard deviations behind in math and 0.06 to 0.11 standard deviations behind in reading)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Achievement disparities remained wider in spring 2022 than before the pandemic, and constant-gain trends imply recovery timelines extending past federal recovery-fund spending deadlines — related
- First- and second-grade spring 2022 achievement in reading and math was lower than spring 2019 prepandemic achievement — related
- The average student demonstrated positive math and reading gains during the 2020-2021 school year — related
- End-of-2021-22 student achievement remained lower than a typical year, with larger declines in math (5 to 10 percentile points) than reading (2 to 4 percentile points) — a broader claim this one bears on
- Reading and math achievement gains in 2021-22 paralleled pre-pandemic trends in many grades, with stronger rebounding in math and among younger students — related
- After the U.S. Department of Education offered assessment waivers to all 50 states in 2019-2020, many educators and policymakers advocated restarting assessment programs in 2020-2021 to evaluate teaching and learning and inform recovery policies — related
- Researchers have translated test scores into months of learning to claim how many months or years students are behind in school — related
- Students in The Netherlands lost on average 3.16 percentile points (0.08 SD) in achievement during the 8-week COVID-19 lockdown — related
- Year 4 students in major cities demonstrated one month's additional reading growth in 2020 compared with 2019 — related
- First graders in 2021–22 grew less in math and reading than a typical prepandemic year, by 6–7% — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
spring-2021-students-behind-prepandemic-averages |
title |
By spring 2021 students remained behind typical prepandemic achievement averages in both math and reading |
description |
By spring 2021 students remained behind typical prepandemic achievement averages in both math and reading |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
recheck_by |
2027 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — megan-kuhfeld-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.