Claims

CPR knowledge and technical skills remained at a sufficient level at 6-month and 1-year follow-ups, with refresher courses recommended

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · no dated study recorded · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Follow-up periods of 6 months and 1 year post-intervention showed participants' CPR knowledge and technical acquisition remained at a sufficient level. → Zenani 2022 q3 i? The review recommends refresher courses at more frequent, shorter intervals for optimal retention of CPR skills and knowledge. → Zenani 2022

Evidence

Zenani 2022

Zenani, N.E., Bello, B., Molekodi, M., & Useh, U., 2022, 'Effectiveness of school-based CPR training among adolescents to enhance knowledge and skills in CPR: A systematic review', Curationis 45(1), a2325. https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v45i1.2325

q3 · i? · review · r3

Discussion of follow-up evidence across included studies. The shortest follow-up (Tsai et al., 3 months) showed a slight drop of 1% in CPR knowledge; the review states "it is recommended to have refresher courses more frequently and in shorter intervals for optimal retention".

"Other follow-up periods of 6 months and 1 year post-intervention showed that overall, the participants' CPR knowledge and CPR technical acquisition remained at a sufficient level."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.