Evidence on SBL retention of knowledge and skills is mixed and limited to two-to-five-month follow-ups¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Of eight studies assessing retention, six reported 15% improvements while two observed a 5% decline, over follow-ups of two to five months. → Alharbi 2024
q2 i? Only 8 of 33 included studies measured outcome durability, constraining generalisable claims about long-term retention. → Alharbi 2024 (2)
Evidence¶
Alharbi 2024¶
Alharbi, A., Nurfianti, A., Mullen, R. F., McClure, J. D., & Miller, W. H. (2024). The effectiveness of simulation-based learning (SBL) on students’ knowledge and skills in nursing programs: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06080-z
q2 · i? · review · r2
Narrative synthesis of the retention theme across the included studies. The review reports six studies with "15% improvements" and two with "a 5% decline", with follow-up periods varying from two to five months; results are characterised as mixed.
"Within the theme of retention, eight studies were assessed the retention. Six of these studies reported 15% improvements, while two observed a 5% decline following the intervention."
Alharbi 2024 (2)¶
Alharbi, A., Nurfianti, A., Mullen, R. F., McClure, J. D., & Miller, W. H. (2024). The effectiveness of simulation-based learning (SBL) on students’ knowledge and skills in nursing programs: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06080-z
q2 · i? · review · r2
Review discussion of longitudinal limitations. The review states only 8 of 33 studies measured durability, with follow-ups "spanning just two to five months post-intervention", which it judges inadequate for long-term maintenance claims.
"Only 8 of the 33 included studies measured outcome durability over time, with retention follow-up assessments spanning just two to five months post-intervention."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Simulation-based learning consistently improves nursing students' knowledge and skills acquisition across diverse designs and simulation topics — related
- Post-intervention knowledge and skill scores rise 20–50% over pre-intervention scores in reviewed SBL studies — related
- Skill retention after simulation is rarely measured; at 2-month follow-up only the VR group maintained significant ISVS improvement — related
- Evidence on long-term retention and transfer of clinical communication skills to clinical practice remained inconsistent or lacking across included reviews — related
- CPR knowledge and technical skills remained at a sufficient level at 6-month and 1-year follow-ups, with refresher courses recommended — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.