Claims

Evidence on SBL retention of knowledge and skills is mixed and limited to two-to-five-month follow-ups

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Of eight studies assessing retention, six reported 15% improvements while two observed a 5% decline, over follow-ups of two to five months. → Alharbi 2024 q2 i? Only 8 of 33 included studies measured outcome durability, constraining generalisable claims about long-term retention. → Alharbi 2024 (2)

Evidence

Alharbi 2024

Alharbi, A., Nurfianti, A., Mullen, R. F., McClure, J. D., & Miller, W. H. (2024). The effectiveness of simulation-based learning (SBL) on students’ knowledge and skills in nursing programs: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06080-z

q2 · i? · review · r2

Narrative synthesis of the retention theme across the included studies. The review reports six studies with "15% improvements" and two with "a 5% decline", with follow-up periods varying from two to five months; results are characterised as mixed.

"Within the theme of retention, eight studies were assessed the retention. Six of these studies reported 15% improvements, while two observed a 5% decline following the intervention."

Alharbi 2024 (2)

Alharbi, A., Nurfianti, A., Mullen, R. F., McClure, J. D., & Miller, W. H. (2024). The effectiveness of simulation-based learning (SBL) on students’ knowledge and skills in nursing programs: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06080-z

q2 · i? · review · r2

Review discussion of longitudinal limitations. The review states only 8 of 33 studies measured durability, with follow-ups "spanning just two to five months post-intervention", which it judges inadequate for long-term maintenance claims.

"Only 8 of the 33 included studies measured outcome durability over time, with retention follow-up assessments spanning just two to five months post-intervention."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.