Effect sizes of creative drama studies published between 2006-2012 (d = 1.208) were higher than those published 2013-2020 (d = 1.168)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Moderator analysis by publication year found the effect size of studies published between 2006-2012 was higher than that of studies published in 2013 and after, though both were very wide and positive. → Hafize Er-Türküresin 2020

Evidence¶

Hafize Er-Türküresin 2020¶

Hafize Er-Türküresin. (2020). The effect of using creative drama method on student achievement in the social studies course: A meta-analysis study. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 7(4), 1881-1896. http://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/1056

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Moderator analysis reported in Table 4 of the meta-analysis, comparing 10 studies from 2006-2012 (d = 1.208, 95% CI 0.784-1.632) with 9 studies from 2013-2020 (d = 1.168, 95% CI 0.770-1.565). The article describes both as very wide and positive.

"In terms of the analysis results given in Table 4, the effect size of the studies published between 2006-2012 (d = 1.208) was higher."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The very large effect found here is consistent with prior meta-analyses of creative drama, which report medium-to-huge positive effects on achievement — related
• Creative drama method has a very large positive effect on Social Studies course achievement in favor of experimental groups (random-effects d = 1.171) — related