Claims

Creative drama method has a very large positive effect on Social Studies course achievement in favor of experimental groups (random-effects d = 1.171)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Across 19 experimental studies, the random-effects average effect size of creative drama on Social Studies achievement was 1.171 (95% CI 0.892-1.449), classified as very large under Thalheimer and Cook's (2002) criteria. → Hafize Er-Türküresin 2020

Evidence

Hafize Er-Türküresin 2020

Hafize Er-Türküresin. (2020). The effect of using creative drama method on student achievement in the social studies course: A meta-analysis study. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 7(4), 1881-1896. http://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/1056

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta-analysis of 19 Turkish experimental studies (4 articles, 15 theses) on creative drama in Social Studies, computed with Hedges' g in the CMA program under a random-effects model. The article reports the average effect size as "1.171" with a 95% CI of 0.892-1.449, a very large effect favoring experimental groups.

"In this study in which the random-effects model was used, the average effect size value was calculated as 1.171, standard error as 0.142, the lower limit of the confidence interval of the average effect size as 0.892 and the upper limit as 1.449."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.