Claims

Effect size of creative drama on skills does not vary significantly by practitioner (researcher vs teacher)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The effect size does not vary significantly depending on whether the practitioner was a researcher (ES=1.154) or a teacher (ES=1.273); QB=.130, p>.05. → Özgür Ulubey 2018

Evidence

Özgür Ulubey 2018

Özgür Ulubey. (2018). The Effect of Creative Drama as a Method on Skills: A Meta-analysis Study. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1172791

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Moderator analysis comparing studies implemented by researchers (f=41) versus teachers (f=12) in the 63-study meta-analysis. The article reports a non-significant Qbetween value; equivalence was not tested, only no significant difference detected.

"It was also found that the effect size does not vary significan tly depending on the practitioner moderator variable (QB= .130; p> .05). The effect sizes found in the studies conducte d by both teachers (ES= 1.273) and researchers (ES=1.154) are large according to the Cohen’s (1988) classifica tion."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.