Claims

Effect size of creative drama does not vary significantly by skill type (social, basic language, higher thinking)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The effect size does not vary significantly across skill types (QB=3.597, p>.05); social skills (ES=.900), basic language skills (ES=1.481) and higher thinking skills (ES=1.002) all show large and similar effects. → Özgür Ulubey 2018

Evidence

Özgür Ulubey 2018

Özgür Ulubey. (2018). The Effect of Creative Drama as a Method on Skills: A Meta-analysis Study. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1172791

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Moderator analysis across the three skill categories (social f=22, basic language f=27, higher thinking f=14) in the meta-analysis. The article reports a non-significant Qbetween value and large, similar effect sizes for all three categories.

"The effect size was found to be not varying significantly depending on this moderator variable (Q B=3.597, p>.05). The social (ES= .900), basic language (ES= 1.481) and higher thinki ng (ES= 1.002) skills were found to have large and similar effect sizes according to the Cohen’s (1988) classification."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.