For Standards 1-3, the omnibus CREST score showed a positive but statistically non-significant treatment effect, and the mirrored Feel composite showed no significant effect¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? The Feelings about Behavior composite showed no statistically significant main treatment effect, suggesting treatment and control groups reported similar levels of concern about negative behavior. → Krystal M. Hinerman 2014

Evidence¶

Krystal M. Hinerman 2014¶

Krystal M. Hinerman, Darrell M. Hull, Darrell M. Hayes, Marvin G. Evans, Maria L. Reyes. (2014). Childhood Resiliency Effects from Schoolwide Treatment: A Cluster Randomized Trial. SREE Fall 2014 Conference. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED562710

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Intent-to-treat HLM analysis of the Standards 1-3 Feelings about Behavior composite in the cluster-randomized trial showed no statistically significant main treatment effect; the authors interpret this as both groups reporting similar levels of concern about negative behavior.

"While the absence of a statistically significant main treatment effect on the mirrored “Feel” items seems to suggest both treatment and control groups report similar levels of concern about negative behavior and appreciation for approval when engaging in positive behavior."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Standards 4-6 students assigned to CREST showed a statistically significant multivariate main treatment effect on the joint profile of positive youth development outcomes — related
• Infant 1 and 2 students showed no statistically significant main or cross-level CREST treatment effects, which the authors attribute to low measurement reliability in ages 4-5 — related
• The CREST treatment produced a statistically significant main treatment effect on the Engage composite for Standards 1-3 students in Belize City primary schools — related