Infant 1 and 2 students showed no statistically significant main or cross-level CREST treatment effects, which the authors attribute to low measurement reliability in ages 4-5¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? For Infant 1 and 2, intent-to-treat HLM analyses on the total CREST, Attachment, and Engagement scores found no statistically significant main treatment effects or cross-level interaction effects, with less than 1% additional variance explained. → Krystal M. Hinerman 2014
q3 i? The authors interpret the null Infant 1-2 results as likely due to low reliability of paper-and-pencil measurement of latent constructs in participants aged 4-5, while noting positive coefficients. → Krystal M. Hinerman 2014
Evidence¶
Krystal M. Hinerman 2014¶
Krystal M. Hinerman, Darrell M. Hull, Darrell M. Hayes, Marvin G. Evans, Maria L. Reyes. (2014). Childhood Resiliency Effects from Schoolwide Treatment: A Cluster Randomized Trial. SREE Fall 2014 Conference. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED562710
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Intent-to-treat HLM analyses for the Infant 1 and 2 survey version of the cluster-randomized trial, with treatment as a Level 2 predictor and composite pretest at Level 1, on total CREST, Attachment, and Engagement outcomes. No significant effects; equivalence was not tested.
"No statistically significant main treatment effects or cross-level interaction effects were noted and adding the treatment indicator to the Level 2 models explained less than 1% additional variance in slope and intercept over the model with only the pretest as a predictor."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Standards 4-6 students assigned to CREST showed a statistically significant multivariate main treatment effect on the joint profile of positive youth development outcomes — related
- The CREST treatment produced a statistically significant main treatment effect on the Engage composite for Standards 1-3 students in Belize City primary schools — related
- For Standards 1-3, the omnibus CREST score showed a positive but statistically non-significant treatment effect, and the mirrored Feel composite showed no significant effect — related
- Post hoc univariate HLM analyses on Standards 4-6 composites revealed no statistically significant treatment effects despite the significant multivariate effect — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.