Post hoc univariate HLM analyses on Standards 4-6 composites revealed no statistically significant treatment effects despite the significant multivariate effect¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Post hoc univariate intent-to-treat HLM models on the separate Standards 4-6 composites (e.g., Anxiety, Peer Affiliation, Substance Abuse & Violence, Moral Center, SECD) revealed no statistically significant treatment effects. → Krystal M. Hinerman 2014

Evidence¶

Krystal M. Hinerman 2014¶

Krystal M. Hinerman, Darrell M. Hull, Darrell M. Hayes, Marvin G. Evans, Maria L. Reyes. (2014). Childhood Resiliency Effects from Schoolwide Treatment: A Cluster Randomized Trial. SREE Fall 2014 Conference. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED562710

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Post hoc univariate intent-to-treat HLM analyses on the separate Standards 4-6 composite outcomes from the cluster-randomized trial, reported in Table 7. No statistically significant treatment effects on any separate construct; equivalence was not tested.

"The post hoc univariate HLM analysis on the separate constructs revealed no statistically significant treatment effects."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Standards 4-6 students assigned to CREST showed a statistically significant multivariate main treatment effect on the joint profile of positive youth development outcomes — related
• Infant 1 and 2 students showed no statistically significant main or cross-level CREST treatment effects, which the authors attribute to low measurement reliability in ages 4-5 — related