Cultural safety training programs used a wide variety of delivery modalities, with teaching/lectures most common (30%), and only 12% provided follow-up support beyond the primary training period¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · reviewr2–r3·q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Training interventions described multiple modalities, with teaching/lectures most common (n = 21; 30%), followed by workshops (26%), discussion sessions (23%), and immersive experiences/community visits (19%). → MacLean Tammy L. 2023
q3 i? Eight papers (12%) described provision of follow-up support for learners beyond the primary training period. → MacLean Tammy L. 2023 (2)
Evidence¶
MacLean Tammy L. 2023¶
MacLean Tammy L., Qiang Jinfan Rose, Henderson Lynn, Bowra Andrea, Howard Lisa, Pringle Victoria, Butsang Tenzin, Rice Emma, Di Ruggiero Erica, Mashford-Pringle Angela. (2023). Indigenous Cultural Safety Training for Applied Health, Social Work, and Education Professionals: A PRISMA Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20065217
q3 · i? · review · r2
Frequency analysis of training modalities across the 69 papers describing a cultural safety training intervention. The review reports all interventions described more than one modality, with teaching/lectures, workshops, discussion sessions, and immersive experiences most common.
"Teaching/lectures was the most common training modality, described in almost a third of papers (n = 21; 30%). Workshops (n = 18; 26%), discussions sessions (n = 16; 23%), and immersive experiences/community visits (n = 13; 19%) were also common"
MacLean Tammy L. 2023 (2)¶
MacLean Tammy L., Qiang Jinfan Rose, Henderson Lynn, Bowra Andrea, Howard Lisa, Pringle Victoria, Butsang Tenzin, Rice Emma, Di Ruggiero Erica, Mashford-Pringle Angela. (2023). Indigenous Cultural Safety Training for Applied Health, Social Work, and Education Professionals: A PRISMA Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20065217
q3 · i? · review · r3
Frequency analysis of post-program support across the described training interventions. The review reports only eight papers (12%) described follow-up support for learners beyond the primary training period.
"Notably, eight papers (12%) described the provision of follow up support for learners of cultural safety beyond the primary training period."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Evaluation of cultural safety training interventions was inconsistent: 46% of papers evaluated programs, methods varied widely, post-surveys were most common, and only half stated evaluation limitations — related
- Training durations varied widely, most commonly 1–5 days/sessions (22%), ranging from one-off lectures to content embedded across four-year degrees — related
- Half of described training interventions involved Indigenous people in delivery (51%), and university professors/administrators were the most frequently mentioned deliverers (36%) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.