Claims

Cultural safety training programs used a wide variety of delivery modalities, with teaching/lectures most common (30%), and only 12% provided follow-up support beyond the primary training period

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r2–r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Training interventions described multiple modalities, with teaching/lectures most common (n = 21; 30%), followed by workshops (26%), discussion sessions (23%), and immersive experiences/community visits (19%). → MacLean Tammy L. 2023 q3 i? Eight papers (12%) described provision of follow-up support for learners beyond the primary training period. → MacLean Tammy L. 2023 (2)

Evidence

MacLean Tammy L. 2023

MacLean Tammy L., Qiang Jinfan Rose, Henderson Lynn, Bowra Andrea, Howard Lisa, Pringle Victoria, Butsang Tenzin, Rice Emma, Di Ruggiero Erica, Mashford-Pringle Angela. (2023). Indigenous Cultural Safety Training for Applied Health, Social Work, and Education Professionals: A PRISMA Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20065217

q3 · i? · review · r2

Frequency analysis of training modalities across the 69 papers describing a cultural safety training intervention. The review reports all interventions described more than one modality, with teaching/lectures, workshops, discussion sessions, and immersive experiences most common.

"Teaching/lectures was the most common training modality, described in almost a third of papers (n = 21; 30%). Workshops (n = 18; 26%), discussions sessions (n = 16; 23%), and immersive experiences/community visits (n = 13; 19%) were also common"

MacLean Tammy L. 2023 (2)

MacLean Tammy L., Qiang Jinfan Rose, Henderson Lynn, Bowra Andrea, Howard Lisa, Pringle Victoria, Butsang Tenzin, Rice Emma, Di Ruggiero Erica, Mashford-Pringle Angela. (2023). Indigenous Cultural Safety Training for Applied Health, Social Work, and Education Professionals: A PRISMA Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20065217

q3 · i? · review · r3

Frequency analysis of post-program support across the described training interventions. The review reports only eight papers (12%) described follow-up support for learners beyond the primary training period.

"Notably, eight papers (12%) described the provision of follow up support for learners of cultural safety beyond the primary training period."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.