Half of described training interventions involved Indigenous people in delivery (51%), and university professors/administrators were the most frequently mentioned deliverers (36%)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · reviewr2–r3·q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Half of the articles describing cultural safety training reported Indigenous people(s) were involved in delivering the intervention (n = 35; 51%). → MacLean Tammy L. 2023
q3 i? University professors/administrators were mentioned as deliverers in approximately 25 articles (36%), with clinicians/clinical instructors (30%) and Indigenous Elders/mentors/cultural educators/community organizations (28%) also common. → MacLean Tammy L. 2023 (2)
Evidence¶
MacLean Tammy L. 2023¶
MacLean Tammy L., Qiang Jinfan Rose, Henderson Lynn, Bowra Andrea, Howard Lisa, Pringle Victoria, Butsang Tenzin, Rice Emma, Di Ruggiero Erica, Mashford-Pringle Angela. (2023). Indigenous Cultural Safety Training for Applied Health, Social Work, and Education Professionals: A PRISMA Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20065217
q3 · i? · review · r3
Frequency analysis of delivery actors across the described training interventions. The review reports Indigenous involvement in delivery in n = 35 (51%) of articles, counting Elders/mentors/cultural educators/community organizations and other categories.
"Finally, half of the articles that described cultural safety training reported that Indigenous people(s) were involved in delivering the intervention (n = 35; 51%)."
MacLean Tammy L. 2023 (2)¶
MacLean Tammy L., Qiang Jinfan Rose, Henderson Lynn, Bowra Andrea, Howard Lisa, Pringle Victoria, Butsang Tenzin, Rice Emma, Di Ruggiero Erica, Mashford-Pringle Angela. (2023). Indigenous Cultural Safety Training for Applied Health, Social Work, and Education Professionals: A PRISMA Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20065217
q3 · i? · review · r2
Frequency analysis of who delivered the training. The review reports university professors/administrators (36%), clinicians/clinical instructors (30%), and Indigenous Elders/mentors/cultural educators/community organizations (28%) as the most frequently mentioned deliverers.
"In terms of delivering cultural safety training interventions, university professors/administrators were mentioned in approximately twenty-five articles that described cultural safety training (25; 36%)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Indigenous peoples were commonly involved in developing cultural safety training programs (70% of described programs), but their specific roles were rarely specified — related
- Cultural safety training programs used a wide variety of delivery modalities, with teaching/lectures most common (30%), and only 12% provided follow-up support beyond the primary training period — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.