Claims

Embedding computational thinking in a sixth-grade mathematics classroom significantly increased students' understanding of mathematical processes versus control

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? When computational thinking ideas were embedded in sixth-grade mathematics, students' understanding of mathematical processes increased significantly compared to a control group. → Yadav 2016

Evidence

Yadav 2016

Yadav, A., Hong, H., & Stephenson, C. (2016). Computational Thinking for All: Pedagogical Approaches to Embedding 21st Century Problem Solving in K-12 Classrooms. TechTrends. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0087-7

q2 · i? · theoretical · r2

The article reports, citing Calao et al. (2015), a study in which CT ideas were embedded in a sixth-grade mathematics classroom and "students’ un- derstanding of mathematical processes increased significantly when compared to students in the control group." No effect size or sample size is printed in this article.

"a recent study found that when computational thinking ideas were em- bedded in a sixth grade mathematics classroom, students’ un- derstanding of mathematical processes increased significantly when compared to students in the control group (Calao et al. 2015)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id ct-embedded-sixth-grade-math-increased-understanding
title Embedding computational thinking in a sixth-grade mathematics classroom significantly increased students' understanding of mathematical processes versus control
description Embedding computational thinking in a sixth-grade mathematics classroom significantly increased students' understanding of mathematical processes versus control
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — yadav-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.