Sixth graders scored significantly higher on posttests that included the seven-step problem-solving plan than on unformatted posttests¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 1994 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Students who received the formatted posttest scored significantly higher than those who received the unformatted posttest (p = .023). → Zambo 1994
Evidence¶
Zambo 1994¶
Zambo, Ron; Hess, Robert. (1994). The Gender Differential Effects of a Procedural Plan for Solving Mathematical Word Problems. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED375005
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Independent t-test comparing posttest scores of the two test-sequence groups (n=155 sixth graders total) in this quasi-experimental counterbalanced study. The formatted posttest group was favored, "(df=153, t = 2.30, p = .023)". No effect size is printed.
"However, for the post test a significant difference was found favoring students who received the formatted post test versus those who received the unformatted post test (df=153, t = 2.30, p = .023)."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Problem Solving — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Three weeks of explicit language-focused strategy instruction produced no significant word-problem gain in this study — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Fourth-graders perform substantially better on computation tests than on word problems using the same numbers — related
- In one word-problem study, females gained significantly when the formatted procedural plan came after an unformatted test, and scored lower when the formatted test came first — related
- No significant gender difference in word-problem performance on either formatted or unformatted test forms — related
- Embedding computational thinking in a sixth-grade mathematics classroom significantly increased students' understanding of mathematical processes versus control — related
- Student interviews indicate the formatted plan demanded more work and time, with mixed perceptions of step helpfulness — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
formatted-problem-solving-plan-posttest-advantage |
title |
Sixth graders scored significantly higher on posttests that included the seven-step problem-solving plan than on unformatted posttests |
description |
Sixth graders scored significantly higher on posttests that included the seven-step problem-solving plan than on unformatted posttests |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
1994 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — zambo-1994 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.