A meta-analysis of 20 studies found a large effect (Hedges' g = 0.871) for CTA use in training design¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoreticalr3·q2·i3large
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i3 A meta-analysis of 20 studies reviewing the use of CTA in training design reported a large effect size of Hedges' g = 0.871. → Olivia Brown 2024
Evidence¶
Olivia Brown 2024¶
Olivia Brown, Nicola Power, and Julie Gore. (2024). Cognitive Task Analysis: Eliciting Expert Cognition in Context. Organizational Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281241271216
q2 · i3 · theoretical · r3
The article reports, citing Tofel-Grehl and Feldon (2013), a meta-analysis of 20 studies on CTA in training design with "Hedges ’ g = 0.871". The article presents this as grounds to expect similar benefits in a management context; the meta-analysis itself is second-hand.
"The large effect size (Hedges ’ g = 0.871) reported in a meta-analysis of 20 studies reviewing the use of CTA in training design indicates that we can expect to see similar bene fits in a management context"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- CDM study of emergency responders (31 participants, over 51 hours of interviews) generated a theoretical model of command-level indecision
- Instructionally supported (prompted) journal writing outperforms unsupported journal writing on learning outcomes (Hedges's g = 0.78) — related
- CSCL scripts have a small significant positive effect on domain learning compared to unstructured collaborative learning — related
- Parent Implemented Intervention Improves Outcomes — related
- Taking and reviewing handwritten notes yields slightly higher achievement than typing notes among college students, by one meta-analysis reported second-hand — related
- Interleaving during concept learning benefits memory of studied items, with effect sizes (Hedges' g) of up to 0.65 — related
- Fluency training shows the largest intervention effect (g = 1.78) among intervention methods — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
cta-training-design-meta-analysis-large-effect |
title |
A meta-analysis of 20 studies found a large effect (Hedges' g = 0.871) for CTA use in training design |
description |
A meta-analysis of 20 studies found a large effect (Hedges' g = 0.871) for CTA use in training design |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — olivia-brown-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.