Claims

Fluency training shows the largest intervention effect (g = 1.78) among intervention methods

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r? · q4 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q4 i3 Fluency training appeared as the most effective intervention method with a large effect of g = 1.78. → Yijun Ruan 2024

Evidence

Yijun Ruan 2024

Yijun Ruan, Urs Maurer, Catherine McBride. (2024). Effectiveness of Reading Interventions on Literacy Skills for Chinese Children with and Without Dyslexia: a Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09915-9

q4 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r?

Meta-regression comparing intervention methods across the 28 included RCTs. The article reports fluency training had the largest effect (g = 1.78), though it also cautions elsewhere that there are a limited number of Chinese fluency studies and efficacy "should be concluded with caution".

"Specifically, fluency training (g = 1.78) appeared as the most effective intervention method with a large effect."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id fluency-training-largest-effect-chinese-children
title Fluency training shows the largest intervention effect (g = 1.78) among intervention methods
description Fluency training shows the largest intervention effect (g = 1.78) among intervention methods
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — yijun-ruan-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.