Claims

Staff reported extremely positive perceptions of CtG professional development and collaboration

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Teachers and non-teaching staff from participating schools were extremely positive about involvement in CtG and valued professional development and collaboration opportunities. → West 2017

Evidence

West 2017

West, M., Ainscow, M., Wigelsworth, M., & Troncoso, P. (2017). Challenge the Gap: Evaluation report and executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581102

q2 · i? · qualitative · r?

Process evaluation finding from surveys, school visits, interviews, and monitoring postings on the CtG website with participating staff.

"Teachers and non -teaching staff from participating schools were extremely positive about the involvement of their schools in the CtG programme and valued both the professional development opportunities it provided and the opportunity to collaborate with partner schools."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.