Adding a quadratic achievement term leaves the negative contextual-mean effect essentially unchanged¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Modest nonlinearity in the achievement–self-concept relation exists, but including L1² does not materially alter the negative class-average effect. → Herbert W. Marsh 2026
Evidence¶
Herbert W. Marsh 2026¶
Herbert W. Marsh. (2026). Four Decades After the Big-Fish–Little-Pond Effect: Critical Boundary Tests and Integrative Models of Mean-Context, Ordinal-Standing, and Distributional-Scaling in 46 Countries. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10200-0
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Multilevel Model 3 in the same TIMSS 2019 sample added a quadratic achievement term, confirming "modest nonlinearity in the L1–MSC relation (L1² = 0.104, SE = 0.002)" while the contextual effect stayed essentially unchanged (L2 = − 0.660, SE = 0.006).
"Model 3 (Table 1) added a quadratic term for individual achievement and confirmed modest nonlinearity in the L1–MSC relation (L1² = 0.104, SE = 0.002; L1 = 0.577, SE = 0.003). Crucially, however, inclusion of the quadratic term left the contextual effect essentially unchanged (L2 = − 0.660, SE = 0.006, compared with − 0.633 in Model 2)."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Academic Self-Concept — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Contextual-mean effects show little moderation by individual achievement; apparent positive moderation is illusory when the quadratic term is omitted — related
- Class-average achievement negatively predicts mathematics self-concept after controlling individual achievement (BFLPE replication in TIMSS 2019) — related
- The contextual-mean effect remains negative across every achievement decile and across MSC quantiles, with no systematic attenuation at the top — related
- Integrative models indicate much of the apparent ordinal-rank effect reflects distributionally scaled relative achievement, while contextual means remain the most robust comparative indicator — a broader claim this one bears on
- Positive class-level peer spillover effects on mathematics achievement fail to replicate once measurement error is controlled with doubly latent models — related
- School-average achievement negatively predicts academic self-concept (BFLPE) and GPA in the comprehensive doubly-latent model — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
curvature-adjustment-does-not-eliminate-bflpe |
title |
Adding a quadratic achievement term leaves the negative contextual-mean effect essentially unchanged |
description |
Adding a quadratic achievement term leaves the negative contextual-mean effect essentially unchanged |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — herbert-w-marsh-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.