Claims

Cycling desks increase students' classroom energy expenditure by around 36% relative to normal class hours

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Adolescents with access to bike desks during class expended more energy than during normal class hours, an increase the review reports as around 36%. → Guirado Terry 2021

Evidence

Guirado Terry 2021

Guirado Terry, Chambonnière Camille, Chaput Jean-Philippe, Metz Lore, Thivel David, Duclos Martine. (2021). Effects of Classroom Active Desks on Children and Adolescents’ Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, Academic Achievements and Overall Health: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062828

q3 · i? · review · r3

Results table entry for Torbeyns et al. (2017), an RCT in which the intervention group used bike desks 4 class hours/week for 22 weeks. Energy expenditure with bike desk access was "128.5 ± 34.7 kcal.h−1 vs. 94.6 ± 16.7 kcal.h−1 (p< 0.001)", reported as +36%. No standardized effect size is printed.

"EE: IG EE access bike desks (+36%) > EE normal hours IG bike desks vs. EE IG normal hours: 128.5 ± 34.7 kcal.h−1 vs. 94.6 ± 16.7 kcal.h−1 (p< 0.001)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.