Claims

Studying on a stationary bike (PAL) has no significant effect on university students' final course grades compared to a standard desk

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In a meta-analysis of two randomised controlled trials with 138 participants, studying on a stationary bike had no significant effect on final course grades compared to using a standard desk. → Lynch Julia 2022

Evidence

Lynch Julia 2022

Lynch Julia, O'Donoghue Gráinne, Peiris Casey L. (2022). Classroom Movement Breaks and Physically Active Learning Are Feasible, Reduce Sedentary Behaviour and Fatigue, and May Increase Focus in University Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137775

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1

Meta-analysis of two randomised controlled trials of PAL interventions (Joubert; Pilcher) pooling post-intervention final course grades with random effects models. The review reports "no significant effect on final course grades" with MD 2.16 (95% CI −0.78 to 5.09, I2 0%).

"Considering the meta-analysis of two trials with 138 participants, studying on a stationary bike had no significant effect on final course grades compared to using a standard desk (MD 2.16, 95% CI −0.78 to 5.09, I2 0%)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.