Claims

A DAA activity is rated significantly more motivating than a lecture on perceived sense of learning, enjoyment, and helpfulness

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Students rated the DAA task significantly higher than the lecture on all three motivation measures (perceived sense of learning, enjoyment, helpfulness). → Dalrymple 2013

Evidence

Dalrymple 2013

Dalrymple, O., Sears, D. A., & Evangelou, D. (2013). The Relative Pedagogical Value of Disassemble/Analyze/Assemble (DAA) Activities. Advances in Engineering Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1076105

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experiment in a first-year engineering lab (325 students across two task sequences). Paired-samples t-tests on seven-point ratings: learning 5.30 vs 4.84, t(324) = 7.580, p < .001; enjoyment 5.87 vs 5.23, t(324) = 10.641, p < .001; helpfulness 5.15 vs 4.81, t(324) = 5.263, p < .001. No effect sizes printed.

"Using the paired samples t-test on each element of the motivation measure, the mean ratings for the DAA task were found to be significantly higher than the mean ratings for the lecture"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.