Claims

Daily training on consecutive days appears more effective than weekly or massed schedules for VR-based psychomotor skill acquisition

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Daily training on consecutive days produced a psychomotor training effect superior to weekly training schedules in the studies by Güldner et al. and Kang et al. → Fahl Jan Torge 2023

Evidence

Fahl Jan Torge 2023

Fahl Jan Torge, Duvivier Robbert, Reinke Laurens, Pierie Jean-Pierre E. N., Schönrock-Adema Johanna. (2023). Towards best practice in developing motor skills: a systematic review on spacing in VR simulator-based psychomotor training for surgical novices. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04046-1

q2 · i? · review · r3

Review synthesis across the limited sample of included studies comparing massed, daily and weekly schedules. The review concludes that "daily training on consecutive days" yielded superior training effects, while cautioning the sample is limited and heterogeneous.

"A daily training on consecutive days, as adopted by Güldner et al. and Kang et al., resulted in a psychomotor training effect superior to that of a weekly training schedule [35, 37]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.