Data collection year does not significantly predict the digital reading-comprehension association, though it becomes significant when an outlier is included¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesisr2·q2–q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In the main moderator analysis, data collection year was not a significant predictor of the effect size (p = .121), contrary to the shallowing-based expectation of increasingly negative associations. → Altamura 2023
q2 i? When the influential outlier was included in the meta-regression, data collection year turned significant (b = -.014; 95% CI: -.27, -.001; p = .043). → Altamura 2023 (2)
Evidence¶
Altamura 2023¶
Altamura, L., Vargas, C., & Salmerón, L. (2023). Do New Forms of Reading Pay Off? A Meta-Analysis on the Relationship Between Leisure Digital Reading Habits and Text Comprehension. Review of Educational Research, 95(1), 53–88. doi:10.3102/00346543231216463
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
Multilevel meta-regression on the 39 effect sizes found data collection year did not significantly predict the association between leisure digital reading habits and comprehension, contradicting the article's hypothesis of a more negative association in more recent studies.
"Lastly, contrary to our expectations, the data collection year was not significant as a predictor (p = .121)."
Altamura 2023 (2)¶
Altamura, L., Vargas, C., & Salmerón, L. (2023). Do New Forms of Reading Pay Off? A Meta-Analysis on the Relationship Between Leisure Digital Reading Habits and Text Comprehension. Review of Educational Research, 95(1), 53–88. doi:10.3102/00346543231216463
q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
Sensitivity meta-regression including the outlier study (Gumus & Atalmis, 2011) reversed the year result: the coefficient became significant with a negative value, indicating the year moderation is not robust to outlier inclusion.
"The significance of the moderators remained the same except for the data collection year which turned out significant (𝑏𝑏𝑤𝑤𝑝𝑝𝐴𝐴ℎ 𝑐𝑐𝑜𝑜𝐴𝐴𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝐴𝐴𝑦𝑦 = -.014; 95% CI: -.27, -.001; p =. 043)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Gender did not significantly moderate relationships between social functioning and academic development in preschoolers — related
- Educational stage significantly moderates the digital reading-comprehension association: negative at primary and middle school, positive at high school and university — related
- Leisure digital reading habits show a small positive association with reading comprehension (r = .055), much smaller than for print reading habits — related
- Most school-based intensive longitudinal studies collect data digitally (65.3%), and paper-and-pencil use has decreased significantly since 2020 — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
data-collection-year-moderation-mixed |
title |
Data collection year does not significantly predict the digital reading-comprehension association, though it becomes significant when an outlier is included |
description |
Data collection year does not significantly predict the digital reading-comprehension association, though it becomes significant when an outlier is included |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
mixed |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-20 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — altamura-2023, altamura-2023-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.