Teachers varied in Data Routine enactment, with Sensemaking about the Data least common, and sensemaking activities were strongly associated with open-ended questioning¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Framing Questions (88%) and Exploring the Data (97%) were commonly enacted, while Orienting to the Data (58%) and Sensemaking about the Data (24%) were less common; all four elements appeared in 24% of lessons. → McElhaney 2025
q2 i? 75% of activities incorporating sensemaking used primarily open-ended questioning, compared to 40% of other activities. → McElhaney 2025 (2)
Evidence¶
McElhaney 2025¶
McElhaney, K. W., Hodkowski, N. M., McMahon, L. H., Jacobs, J., Penuel, W. R., Anton, G., Henson, K., Urban, R., & Parker, D. A. (2025). Promoting Mathematical Reasoning in OpenSciEd Middle School Curriculum Units. Digital Promise. https://digitalpromise.dspacedirect.org/items/4ea4b3c5-c663-4484-8727-258bff346d2d doi:10.51388/20.500.12265/281
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Classroom-observation coding of Data Routine enactment across the 43 observed lessons found teachers enacted at least one element in 100% of lessons and all four in 24%, with "Orienting to the Data (58%) and Sensemaking about the Data (24%)" least common.
"Framing Questions (88%) and Exploring the Data (97%) were commonly addressed, while Orienting to the Data (58%) and Sensemaking about the Data (24%) were less common."
McElhaney 2025 (2)¶
McElhaney, K. W., Hodkowski, N. M., McMahon, L. H., Jacobs, J., Penuel, W. R., Anton, G., Henson, K., Urban, R., & Parker, D. A. (2025). Promoting Mathematical Reasoning in OpenSciEd Middle School Curriculum Units. Digital Promise. https://digitalpromise.dspacedirect.org/items/4ea4b3c5-c663-4484-8727-258bff346d2d. doi:10.51388/20.500.12265/281
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Coding of each lesson activity for questioning approach found teachers who facilitated at least one sensemaking activity used open-ended questioning much more frequently; "75% of activities that incorporated sensemaking used primarily open-ended questioning, compared to just 40% of other activities."
"75% of activities that incorporated sensemaking used primarily open-ended questioning, compared to just 40% of other activities."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Personalized Learning Effects Vary With Fidelity — related
- Teachers addressed graph comprehension consistently at high levels across observed lessons, while covariational reasoning enactment varied widely by lesson — related
- Observed classroom implementation promoted science practices and core ideas, with Observing and Describing most frequent and coverage varying by unit — related
- Video analysis showed teachers enacted the same MDP in different ways and situations, while perceiving barriers to consistent implementation — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
data-routine-sensemaking-least-common-open-questioning |
title |
Teachers varied in Data Routine enactment, with Sensemaking about the Data least common, and sensemaking activities were strongly associated with open-ended questioning |
description |
Teachers varied in Data Routine enactment, with Sensemaking about the Data least common, and sensemaking activities were strongly associated with open-ended questioning |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — mcelhaney-2025, mcelhaney-2025-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.