Observed classroom implementation promoted science practices and core ideas, with Observing and Describing most frequent and coverage varying by unit¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 2 studies · 2 designr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Most observed activities addressed science practices, with Observing and Describing the most common practice cluster (40%) and others infrequent. → practices-1
q2 i? Most observed activities addressed science core ideas, with the percentage promoting at least one core idea varying by unit (Ramps 88%, Shadows 86%, Plants 70%). → core-ideas-1
Evidence¶
practices-1¶
Dominguez, X., Vidiksis, R., Leones, T., Kamdar, D., Presser, A., Bueno, M., & Orr, J. (2023, April). Integrating science, mathematics, and engineering: Linking home and school learning for young learners. Digital Promise. https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/180
q2 · i? · design · r3
Classroom observation coding across 63 observed science activities in the eight intervention classrooms. The report states Observing and Describing was promoted in 40% of observed activities, while Comparing/Contrasting (9%), Sorting (8%), Predicting (9%), Experimenting (13%) and Documenting (14%) were infrequent.
"The practice cluster most often addressed across units was Observing and Describing, with 40% of the activities/lessons observed promoting engagement in this practice. Comparing/Contrasting (9%), Sorting (8%), Predicting (9%), Experimenting (13%) and Documenting (14%) were all infrequently promoted."
core-ideas-1¶
Dominguez, X., Vidiksis, R., Leones, T., Kamdar, D., Presser, A., Bueno, M., & Orr, J. (2023, April). Integrating science, mathematics, and engineering: Linking home and school learning for young learners. Digital Promise. https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/180
q2 · i? · design · r3
Observation coding for the Ramps Unit: 88% of observed ramps activities promoted at least one core idea, with steeper ramps making objects move faster observed most frequently (20%). Shadows (86%) and Plants (70%) units showed similar majority coverage with unit variation.
"A majority of the observed ramps activities/lessons (88%) promoted at least one core idea."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Teachers varied in Data Routine enactment, with Sensemaking about the Data least common, and sensemaking activities were strongly associated with open-ended questioning — related
- Teachers addressed graph comprehension consistently at high levels across observed lessons, while covariational reasoning enactment varied widely by lesson — related
- Video analysis showed teachers enacted the same MDP in different ways and situations, while perceiving barriers to consistent implementation — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
nico-nor-classroom-science-practices-coverage |
title |
Observed classroom implementation promoted science practices and core ideas, with Observing and Describing most frequent and coverage varying by unit |
description |
Observed classroom implementation promoted science practices and core ideas, with Observing and Describing most frequent and coverage varying by unit |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — practices-1, core-ideas-1 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.