The DD process and product cultivated commitment and trust among participants and informed a new university AI governance policy¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer2·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The DD consultation's process and co-produced principles cultivated participant commitment and trust and fed into university AI governance policy. → Teresa Swist 2024
Evidence¶
Teresa Swist 2024¶
Teresa Swist, Simon Buckingham Shum, Kalervo N. Gulson. (2024). Co-producing AIED Ethics Under Lockdown: an Empirical Study of Deliberative Democracy in Action. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 34:670–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00380-z
q2 · i? · qualitative · r2
The article's summary evaluation of the UTS case: the DD consultation's process and co-produced principles "cultivated commitment and trust" and informed a new university AI governance policy; four DMP members presented revised principles to three senior leaders.
"cultivated commitment and trust among the participants, informing a new university AI governance policy."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- A university-wide Deliberative Democracy process enabled higher education stakeholders to integrate situated knowledge through structured dialogue to co-produce AAI-EdTech ethical principles — a broader claim this one bears on
- Participants reported that the trust-building collaborative environment enabled open and vulnerable sharing — related
- Stakeholders viewed the co-produced principles as distinct across organisational, sectoral and policy levels — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
dd-cultivated-trust-governance-policy |
title |
The DD process and product cultivated commitment and trust among participants and informed a new university AI governance policy |
description |
The DD process and product cultivated commitment and trust among participants and informed a new university AI governance policy |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — teresa-swist-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.