Claims

Deaf students in a 7-day astronomy project learned between 9 and 13 new astronomy words in sign language

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-11-03 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After the project, students reported learning between 9 and 13 new astronomy vocabularies in sign language, with a great majority learning more than 10. → Bolat 2016

Evidence

Bolat 2016

Bolat, M. (2016). The Development and Implementation of a Model for Teaching Astronomy to Deaf Students. Journal of Education and Training Studies. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i7.1506

q2 · i? · design · r2

Post-test findings of a single-group (no control) post-test design with 30 deaf students, tested 20 days after the project ended; students wrote down the new sign-language vocabulary they learned. The article reports students "learned between 9 to 13 new vocabularies".

"it was found that they learned between 9 to 13 new vocabularies. The numbers of students corresponding to the numbers of words learned were given in Table 7."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.