Deaf students in a 7-day astronomy project learned between 9 and 13 new astronomy words in sign language¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-11-03 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? After the project, students reported learning between 9 and 13 new astronomy vocabularies in sign language, with a great majority learning more than 10. → Bolat 2016
Evidence¶
Bolat 2016¶
Bolat, M. (2016). The Development and Implementation of a Model for Teaching Astronomy to Deaf Students. Journal of Education and Training Studies. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i7.1506
q2 · i? · design · r2
Post-test findings of a single-group (no control) post-test design with 30 deaf students, tested 20 days after the project ended; students wrote down the new sign-language vocabulary they learned. The article reports students "learned between 9 to 13 new vocabularies".
"it was found that they learned between 9 to 13 new vocabularies. The numbers of students corresponding to the numbers of words learned were given in Table 7."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Access — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.