Deaf students ordered close celestial bodies more successfully than far celestial bodies after the project¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In the post-test, 18 of 30 students correctly ordered Sun-Jupiter-Earth-Moon while 16 of 30 correctly ordered Space-Galaxy-Star-Earth, and students were more successful with close bodies. → Bolat 2016
Evidence¶
Bolat 2016¶
Bolat, M. (2016). The Development and Implementation of a Model for Teaching Astronomy to Deaf Students. Journal of Education and Training Studies. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i7.1506
q2 · i? · design · r2
Post-test comparison of two ordering questions in the same single-group study of 30 deaf students: 18 correct answers for close bodies (Sun-Jupiter-Earth-Moon) and 16 correct for far bodies (Space-Galaxy-Star-Earth), reported as frequencies in Tables 8 and 9.
"when compared with the results in Table 8, the students were found to be more successful in ordering the close celestial bodies than ordering far celestial bodies."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Access — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Deaf students held alternative conceptions about seasons, attributing them to the Moon's shadow and clouds — related
- Deaf students in a 7-day astronomy project learned between 9 and 13 new astronomy words in sign language — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.