Claims

Deaf students ordered close celestial bodies more successfully than far celestial bodies after the project

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the post-test, 18 of 30 students correctly ordered Sun-Jupiter-Earth-Moon while 16 of 30 correctly ordered Space-Galaxy-Star-Earth, and students were more successful with close bodies. → Bolat 2016

Evidence

Bolat 2016

Bolat, M. (2016). The Development and Implementation of a Model for Teaching Astronomy to Deaf Students. Journal of Education and Training Studies. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i7.1506

q2 · i? · design · r2

Post-test comparison of two ordering questions in the same single-group study of 30 deaf students: 18 correct answers for close bodies (Sun-Jupiter-Earth-Moon) and 16 correct for far bodies (Space-Galaxy-Star-Earth), reported as frequencies in Tables 8 and 9.

"when compared with the results in Table 8, the students were found to be more successful in ordering the close celestial bodies than ordering far celestial bodies."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.