Claims

Debate contributed 96.1% to speaking skill achievement, with fluency the largest contributing aspect (67.4%)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Stepwise regression showed the whole aspects of speaking skill contributed 0.961 (96.1%) to speaking achievement, with fluency contributing 67.4%, grammar 13.7%, pronunciation 8.3%, comprehension 5.4%, and vocabulary 1.4%. → Iman 2017

Evidence

Iman 2017

Iman, J. N. (2017). Debate Instruction in EFL Classroom: Impacts on the Critical Thinking and Speaking Skill. International Journal of Instruction, 10(4), 87-108. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1046a

q2 · i? · causal · r?

Stepwise regression analysis on the study's SOLOM-based speaking data (Table 5, final model R = .980, adjusted R Square .950). The contribution percentages are printed as reported; they are variance-explanation figures, not standardized effect sizes.

"the influence of contribution of the whole aspects of Speaking Skill (SS) was 0.961 or 96.1%. Partially, the contribution of each aspect of Speak ing Skill (SS) toward Speaking Skill (SS) achievement was as follows: fluency was 67.4%, grammar was 13.7%, pronunciation was 8.3%, comprehension was 5.4%, and vocabulary was 1.4%"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.