Claims

In the experimental group, fluency was the largest stepwise-regression contributor to speaking achievement (81% partial contribution)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Stepwise regression attributed 81% of speaking achievement to fluency, with pronunciation 14.5%, vocabulary 3.2%, comprehension 0.4%, and grammar 0.9%. → Iman 2017

Evidence

Iman 2017

Jaya Nur IMAN. (2017). A QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON USING SHORT STORIES: STATISTICAL AND INFERENTIAL ANALYSES ON THE NON-ENGLISH MAJOR UNIVERSITY STUDENTS' SPEAKING AND WRITING ACHIEVEMENTS. International Journal of Languages' Education and Teaching, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.18298/ijlet.1719

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Stepwise regression analysis of the experimental group's SOLOM speaking-aspect scores against total speaking achievement. The article reports the whole-aspect influence as 99.9% and correlations per aspect (e.g. 0.900 for fluency); these are variance-decomposition figures, not standardised effect sizes.

"the partial contribution of each aspect of speaking skill toward speaking achievement was 81% for fluency, 14.5% for pronunciation, 3.2% for vocabulary, 0.4 % for comprehension, and 0.9% for grammar"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.