Claims

Post-assessment debriefing supported positive effects on non-technical skills ability in four studies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Four included studies that used debriefing as a hypothesis supported its positive effect on NTS ability, though how debriefing affects NTS in different situations and whether NTS are retained need further exploration. → Kang Jiamin 2024

Evidence

Kang Jiamin 2024

Kang Jiamin, Hu Jiale, Yan Chunji, Xing Xueyan, Tu Shumin, Zhou Fang. (2024). Development and applications of the Anaesthetists’ Non-Technical Skills behavioural marker system: a systematic review. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075019

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports, from its synthesis of included studies, that 43% underwent post-assessment debriefing and "Four studies using debriefing as a hypothesis supported its positive effect on NTS ability". The review does not print effect sizes for this finding.

"Additionally, 43% (n=23 of 54) of the included studies underwent post-assessment debriefing. Four studies using debriefing as a hypothesis supported its positive effect on NTS ability."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.