Delayed explicit and metalinguistic feedback outperforms no feedback on oral accuracy in the final session (p = .044)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The delayed explicit and metalinguistic feedback group significantly outperformed the control group in session 6 oral accuracy. → Farahman Farrokhi 2012

Evidence¶

Farahman Farrokhi 2012¶

Farahman Farrokhi, Mohammad Hassan Chehrazad. (2012). The Effects of Planned Focus on Form on Iranian EFL Learners' Oral Accuracy. World Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v2n1p70

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Dunnett t test on session 6 oral accuracy data from the quasi-experiment: the delayed explicit and metalinguistic group outperformed the no-feedback control group with "p -value = .044"; differences in earlier sessions were not significant.

"the third group which received delayed explicit and metalinguistic feedback on its erroneous production outperformed the control group, ( p -value = .044 < =0.05)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Corrective feedback effects on partially acquired structures may emerge only on delayed measures, not immediately — a broader claim this one bears on
• Planned focus on form via corrective feedback on simple past tense errors improves Iranian EFL learners' oral accuracy by the final treatment session — a broader claim this one bears on
• Intensive recasts and delayed explicit/metalinguistic feedback are equally effective: no significant difference between the two feedback types on oral accuracy — related
• Purely meaning-focused activity without form-focused treatment did not lead learners to improve oral accuracy — related
• Written corrective feedback with an oral metalinguistic tutorial significantly improves Arabic EFL learners' preposition accuracy on an immediate post-test — related