Claims

Purely meaning-focused activity without form-focused treatment did not lead learners to improve oral accuracy

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The control group, which received no feedback, did not significantly improve its oral accuracy scores across the treatment sessions. → Farahman Farrokhi 2012

Evidence

Farahman Farrokhi 2012

Farahman Farrokhi, Mohammad Hassan Chehrazad. (2012). The Effects of Planned Focus on Form on Iranian EFL Learners' Oral Accuracy. World Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v2n1p70

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Authors' interpretation of the control group's performance across the six story-retelling sessions in the quasi-experiment; the control group's session-to-session scores showed no significant improvement, supporting the claim that meaning-focused activity alone did not raise accuracy.

"That the control group, which received no feedback, did not significantly improve their scores on the post tests is also significant in showing that purely meaning focused activities without any kind of form focused treatment do not lead the learners to improve their oral accuracy"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.