Claims

Delaying school start time by 30 or 60 minutes increased children's sleep duration and reduced daytime sleepiness over two years

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After delaying school start time 30 and 60 minutes, sleep duration increased by 15.6 and 22.8 minutes respectively, and the intervention significantly improved sleep duration and daytime sleepiness. → Li Shenghui 2013 q2 i? Control schools showed the opposite change over the same period: decreased sleep duration and increased daytime sleepiness. → Li Shenghui 2013 (2)

Evidence

Li Shenghui 2013

Li Shenghui, Arguelles Lester, Jiang Fan, Chen Wenjuan, Jin Xingming, Yan Chonghuai, Tian Ying, Hong Xiumei, Qian Ceng, Zhang Jun, Wang Xiaobin, Shen Xiaoming. (2013). Sleep, School Performance, and a School-Based Intervention among School-Aged Children: A Sleep Series Study in China. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067928

q2 · i? · causal · r2

School-based intervention trial in six Shanghai primary schools using a 3 groups (control, intervention1, intervention2) × 2 times (baseline, 2-year follow-up) design with two schools randomly assigned per group; comparative cross-sectional analysis of pre- (n = 525) and post-intervention (n = 553) surveys of fourth and fifth graders. The article reports "sleep duration correspondingly increased by 15.6 minutes and 22.8 minutes" and a significant improvement in sleep duration and daytime sleepiness; no standardized effect size is printed.

"After delaying school start time 30 minutes and 60 minutes, respectively, sleep duration correspondingly increased by 15.6 minutes and 22.8 minutes, respectively. Moreover, intervention significantly improved the sleep duration and daytime sleepiness."

Li Shenghui 2013 (2)

Li Shenghui, Arguelles Lester, Jiang Fan, Chen Wenjuan, Jin Xingming, Yan Chonghuai, Tian Ying, Hong Xiumei, Qian Ceng, Zhang Jun, Wang Xiaobin, Shen Xiaoming. (2013). Sleep, School Performance, and a School-Based Intervention among School-Aged Children: A Sleep Series Study in China. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067928

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Same intervention trial, control schools keeping the 7:30am start time; Table 6 shows control sleep duration fell from 9.17±0.73 to 9.01±0.67 (t = −31.48, p<0.001) and frequent daytime sleepiness rose from 23.86% to 36.61%. The article states "an opposite change was observed: a decrease in sleep duration and an up-regulation of daytime sleepiness"; no standardized effect size is printed.

"For the control group, an opposite change was observed: a decrease in sleep duration and an up-regulation of daytime sleepiness."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id delayed-school-start-time-increases-sleep-duration
title Delaying school start time by 30 or 60 minutes increased children's sleep duration and reduced daytime sleepiness over two years
description Delaying school start time by 30 or 60 minutes increased children's sleep duration and reduced daytime sleepiness over two years
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2013
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — li-shenghui-2013, li-shenghui-2013-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.