Simulation-based curriculum with deliberate practice improved cognitive knowledge and cardiovascular assessment skills from pre-test to post-test (Jeffries et al. study)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Thirty-six students who received simulation-based training showed a statistically significant improvement from pre-test to post-test in cognitive knowledge and cardiovascular assessment skills. → Andrade Italo Rigoberto Cavalcante; de Queiroz Johny Carlos; Farias Maria Sinara; Maia Nicole Paulo da Silva; da Silva Lúcia de Fátima 2025
Evidence¶
Andrade Italo Rigoberto Cavalcante; de Queiroz Johny Carlos; Farias Maria Sinara; Maia Nicole Paulo da Silva; da Silva Lúcia de Fátima 2025¶
Andrade Italo Rigoberto Cavalcante; de Queiroz Johny Carlos; Farias Maria Sinara; Maia Nicole Paulo da Silva; da Silva Lúcia de Fátima. (2025). Clinical simulation in the teaching of cardiovascular physical examination with nursing students: a systematic review. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0429
q2 · i? · review · r2
Multicenter prospective quasi-experimental one-group pre-post study across four institutions using the Harvey cardiopulmonary patient simulator and CD-ROM self-learning, as reported in the review's Chart 4; no effect size is printed.
"Thirty-six students who received simulation-based training showed a statistically significant improvement from pre-test to post-test in cognitive knowledge and cardiovascular assessment skills."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Clinical simulation improves nursing students' knowledge, confidence and performance in cardiovascular physical examination compared with traditional teaching, per a systematic review of six studies — a broader claim this one bears on
- Simulation Based Education With Deliberate Practice Improves Clinical Outcomes — a broader claim this one bears on
- Clinical simulation improved overall cardiovascular examination performance compared with traditional lecture in the Brazilian quasi-experimental study (Fernandes et al.) — related
- Single-group studies uniformly reported improvement after distance simulation training in self-assessment, knowledge, or skills — a broader claim this one bears on
- Simulation Based Education Improves Outcomes — a broader claim this one bears on
- Simulation training increased nursing students' confidence in cardiopulmonary physical examination skills more than traditional training (Tawalbeh et al. study) — related
- Simulation-based training improved PPE donning/doffing performance and reduced cognitive load from pre-test to post-test — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.