Claims

Single-group studies uniformly reported improvement after distance simulation training in self-assessment, knowledge, or skills

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? All 39 single-group pre/post studies showed improvement after distance simulation training, in self-assessment (n = 13), knowledge (n = 3), or skills acquisition (n = 23). → Wei W 2026

Evidence

Wei W 2026

Wei W, Nielsen MS, Nielsen AB, Han Y, Russell L, Konge L, Cold KM. (2026). Hands-on Distance Simulation of Technical Skills: A Systematic Review. Simulation in Healthcare. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000881

q2 · i? · review · r3

Review synthesis of 39 single-group pre/post studies of distance simulation; the review reports all showed improvement in self-assessment (n = 13), knowledge (n = 3), or skills acquisition (n = 23).

"Thirty-nine studies used a single-group pre/postdesign, and all showed an improvement after distance simulation training either in self-assessment (n = 13), knowledge (n = 3), or skills acquisition (n = 23)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.