A three-round Delphi study with 29 K-12 AI teachers produced an eight-dimension, 32-item student AI competency framework at a 75% agreement level¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Three Delphi rounds with 29 experienced K-12 AI teachers, using a 75% agreement level, revised an initial 10-dimension, 50-item list into eight finalized dimensions with four items each. → Thomas K. F. Chiu 2025

Evidence¶

Thomas K. F. Chiu 2025¶

Thomas K. F. Chiu, Murat Çoban, Ismaila Temitayo Sanusi, Musa Adekunle Ayanwale. (2025). Validating student AI competency self-efficacy (SAICS) scale and its framework. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10512-y

q2 · i? · design · r3

A three-round Delphi study with 29 K-12 AI education professionals in Hong Kong, using a 75% agreement level, revised the initial materials. The article reports that "Eight dimensions were revised and finalized from 10 dimensions in the initial lists," with three dimensions integrated into one and each dimension holding four items.

"Three Delphi rounds were completed by all the participants. Table 3 shows the results of Rounds 1, 2, and 3. Eight dimensions were revised and finalized from 10 dimensions in the initial lists."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• A three-round Delphi study with 17 experts from education, industry, and cultural expertise produced the SAIL AI literacy framework — related
• Delphi and wider-review feedback led Level 4 to be repositioned as beyond AI literacy, clarifying the boundary of AI literacy — related
• A review of 13 recent AI literacy frameworks found most lack explicit scaffolded progression and are context-bound — related