A three-round Delphi study with 17 experts from education, industry, and cultural expertise produced the SAIL AI literacy framework¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? A Delphi panel of 17 completing experts across three rounds (from 83 invited) generated and validated the competencies and structure of the SAIL framework. → MacCallum K. 2026
Evidence¶
MacCallum K. 2026¶
MacCallum K., Parsons D. & Mohaghegh M. (2026). The Scaffolded AI Literacy (SAIL) Framework: Results of a Delphi Study for Equitable AI Literacy Framework Design in Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100584
q2 · i? · design · r2
Delphi expert-consultation study conducted in Aotearoa New Zealand with three survey rounds between 2023 and 2024. The article reports that "17 completing all three rounds" out of 83 invited, with participants drawn from education, industry, and cultural expertise. No effect sizes are reported; the finding is the process and panel composition.
"A total of 83 experts were invited, with 17 completing all three rounds. Participants included educators, industry professionals, and cultural experts, ensuring diverse perspectives."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- SAIL embeds Indigenous and cultural perspectives as integral competencies across all domains and levels rather than as add-ons — related
- Delphi and wider-review feedback led Level 4 to be repositioned as beyond AI literacy, clarifying the boundary of AI literacy — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- SAIL is designed to address second- and third-level digital divides through scaffolded skills and explicitly embedded equity competencies — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- A review of 13 recent AI literacy frameworks found most lack explicit scaffolded progression and are context-bound — related
- Delphi experts reached 80% or higher consensus on all major CSM-SU components — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
sail-framework-produced-by-three-round-delphi-study |
title |
A three-round Delphi study with 17 experts from education, industry, and cultural expertise produced the SAIL AI literacy framework |
description |
A three-round Delphi study with 17 experts from education, industry, and cultural expertise produced the SAIL AI literacy framework |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-12 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — maccallum-k-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.