Claims

Male students taught by demonstration method scored higher than male students taught by lecture method

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Among male students, the demonstration group outperformed the lecture group on the post-test (means 56.16 vs 53.44), and Ho2 was rejected. → Efe M. Omwirhiren 2016

Evidence

Efe M. Omwirhiren 2016

Efe M. Omwirhiren, Khalil U. Ibrahim. (2016). The Effects of Two Teachers' Instructional Methods on Students' Learning Outcomes in Chemistry in Selected Senior Secondary School in Kaduna Metropolis, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.7, No.15. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1103149

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Subgroup comparison of 25 male students per group in the quasi-experiment. The article reports t cal (0.814) greater than tabulated value (0.424) and F-value (2.255) greater than P-value (0.087), rejecting Ho2 for boys.

"It can be deduced from the tables 4 and 5 that the re is significant differences in the post-test mean s scores between the boys within the lecture and demo nstration method. This means the boys of the experi mental group are better than those of the control group."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.