Claims

Students taught chemical bonding with the demonstration method scored higher on the post-test than students taught by lecture method

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental (demonstration) group had higher post-test mean scores than the control (lecture) group, and the null hypothesis was rejected. → Efe M. Omwirhiren 2016

Evidence

Efe M. Omwirhiren 2016

Efe M. Omwirhiren, Khalil U. Ibrahim. (2016). The Effects of Two Teachers' Instructional Methods on Students' Learning Outcomes in Chemistry in Selected Senior Secondary School in Kaduna Metropolis, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.7, No.15. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1103149

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Pretest-posttest quasi-experimental control group study; 50 students taught by demonstration and 50 by lecture for three weeks. Post-test means were 54.06 (experimental) and 52.80 (control); the article reports "experimental group had higher score than the control group" and rejected Ho1.

"The result obtained from both t-tests and ANOVA tes ts show that there is significance difference between the two group's in terms of their learning outcome in the post test. This means experimental group had higher score than the control group"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.