Claims

After demonstration-technique treatment, students were more active and more confident expressing their ideas than at pre-test

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In post-test, students were more active in class and more confident expressing their ideas than in pre-test, which the researcher attributes to the demonstration technique treatment. → Husnu 2018

Evidence

Husnu 2018

Muhammad Husnu. (2018). Demonstration Technique to Improve Vocabulary and Grammar Element in Teaching Speaking at EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 11(2). http://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n2p26

q2 · i? · causal · r1

The researcher's observational interpretation in the Discussion section, contrasting pre-test inactivity with post-test activity and confidence. This is the author's description of classroom behavior, not a statistically tested measure.

"In pre-test, the students were not active when do the task from the teacher while in post-test students were more active in the class and more confident to express their idea"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.