Claims

Descriptive post-test means show the demonstration group (M = 58.57) scored higher than the control group (M = 48.13)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The mean post-test achievement score of demonstration-method students was greater than that of conventional-approach students. → Inuwa 2018

Evidence

Inuwa 2018

Inuwa, U., Abdullah, Z., & Hassan, H. (2018). A Mixed-Method Study of the Effect of the Demonstration Method on Students' Achievement in Financial Accounting. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 577-592. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1191665

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Descriptive statistics (Table 2) from the same experiment: demonstration group M = 58.57, SD = 3.456; control group M = 48.13, SD = 4.264. These are descriptive means; the inferential test is reported separately in the ANCOVA claim.

"the mean achievement score of students who were exposed to the demonstration method (M = 58.57, SD = 3.456) was greater than the mean achievement score of students who were exposed to the conventional approach (M = 48.13, SD = 4.264)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.