Claims

Students taught with ICT obtained higher mean Economics Achievement Test scores than control students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Participants exposed to ICT had a higher mean post-test score (43.30, SD 4.73) than the control group (35.30, SD 2.79). → Egaga 2015

Evidence

Egaga 2015

Egaga, Patrick I.; Aderibigbe, S. Akinwumi (2015). Efficacy of Information and Communication Technology in Enhancing Learning Outcomes of Students with Hearing Impairment in Ibadan. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.30. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1081324

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive means and standard deviations for the ICT group (mean 43.30, SD 4.73, N 15) and control group (mean 35.30, SD 2.79, N 15) on the Economics Achievement Test; the article concludes ICT was effective than the conventional method.

"Shows that participants exposed to ICT had the highest mean score of (43.30) and was followed by the control group (35.30) respectively."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.