Detected slow oscillation amplitude predicts evoked SO amplitude, and detected spindle amplitude predicts evoked spindle amplitude in delayed stimulation, but not cross-band.¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 In the SO condition, detected SO amplitude correlated with evoked SO amplitude (r = 0.73, p < 0.001); in the SPd condition, detected spindle amplitude correlated with evoked spindle amplitude (r = 0.66, p = 0.004). → Jourde 2026
q3 i? Detected SO amplitude did not correlate with evoked spindle activity (r = -0.07, p = 0.78), and detected spindle amplitude did not correlate with evoked slow wave activity in either spindle condition. → Jourde 2026
Evidence¶
Jourde 2026¶
Jourde, H.R., Sita, K.Z., Eyqvelle, Z., Brooks, M., & Coffey, E.B.J. (2026). Modulating sleep: slow oscillation and spindle stimulation effects on physiology and memory. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00383-6
q3 · i3 · causal · r2
Correlational analysis of stimulation effectiveness in the nap study found "a significant correlation betweenamplitude ofSOat detection and amplitude of the evoked SO (r = 0.73, p < 0.001)"; a parallel finding held for spindles in the delayed condition (r = 0.66, p = 0.004).
"There was a significant correlation betweenamplitude ofSOat detection and amplitude of the evoked SO (r = 0.73, p < 0.001), suggesting that participants with overall stronger SOs at detection were those who showed stronger evoked SOs."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Closed-loop auditory stimulation of slow oscillations and spindles evokes significant neurophysiological responses compared to sham in healthy young adults. — related
- Immediate spindle stimulation truncates the stimulated spindle, while delayed stimulation enhances spindle activity without interruption. — related
- Evoked spindle activity showed modest negative correlations with piano task performance changes, while evoked SO strength showed no clear relationship with performance change. — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
detected-oscillation-amplitude-predicts-evoked-same-band |
title |
Detected slow oscillation amplitude predicts evoked SO amplitude, and detected spindle amplitude predicts evoked spindle amplitude in delayed stimulation, but not cross-band. |
description |
Detected slow oscillation amplitude predicts evoked SO amplitude, and detected spindle amplitude predicts evoked spindle amplitude in delayed stimulation, but not cross-band. |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — jourde-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.