Claims

Dewey argues that science has not justified its early promises as part of the educational curriculum

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r? · q1
Currency · newest study 1910 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Dewey's fundamental thesis is that science as a school subject has not fulfilled its early curricular promises. → J. Dewey 1910

Evidence

J. Dewey 1910

J. Dewey. (1910). Science as Subject-Mattcr and as Method. Science, 31: 787. https://www.science.org/journal/science

q1 · i? · theoretical · r?

The review reports Dewey's address as chairman of Section L, A. A. A. S., at the Boston meeting, stating his "fundamental thesis is that science has not justified its early promises". This is a theoretical argument, not an empirical test.

"His fundamental thesis is that science has not justified its early promises as a part of .the educational curriculum."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id dewey-science-not-justified-curriculum-promises
title Dewey argues that science has not justified its early promises as part of the educational curriculum
description Dewey argues that science has not justified its early promises as part of the educational curriculum
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 1910
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — j-dewey-1910

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.