Students' differing values about a campus predator-prey problem produced no agreed definition of the issue and no agreed action¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer2·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In the predator-prey problem-posing space, students held systems knowledge and varied, value-based views (danger, balance, ecosystem significance), yet reached no collective definition of the problem and lacked action-related knowledge for what to do. → Erin Bridges Bird · Heidi L. Ballard · Margaret Harte 2023
Evidence¶
Erin Bridges Bird · Heidi L. Ballard · Margaret Harte 2023¶
Erin Bridges Bird · Heidi L. Ballard · Margaret Harte. (2023). Data to decision-making: how elementary students use their Community and Citizen Science project to reimagine their school campus. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09612-6
q2 · i? · qualitative · r2
Ethnographic analysis of the Cooper's Hawk problem-posing space (Findings). Macky saw the hawk as a sign of a thriving ecosystem, Selena valued safety and wanted it removed, Garret wanted raptors to control House Sparrows, and Isaak and McKenna expressed uncertainty about the hawk's death and diet.
"Because student-ornithologists valued different things and therefore perceived the situation's priorities in different ways, there was no collective and agreed upon definition of what the specific issue was, nor did student-ornithologists seem to have the action-related knowledge to know what to do."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Global change instruction poses a distinctive challenge: learners must view global change holistically while analysing individual issues at local and regional levels — related
- Dietitians' barriers and enablers to pro-environmental action fall into three themes: personal, social and professional, and contextual and environmental factors — related
- Reflexive noticing shifts teacher discourse from stabilization to possibility, while surprises alone often re-stabilize it — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
differing-values-no-agreed-environmental-decision |
title |
Students' differing values about a campus predator-prey problem produced no agreed definition of the issue and no agreed action |
description |
Students' differing values about a campus predator-prey problem produced no agreed definition of the issue and no agreed action |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — erin-bridges-bird-heidi-l-ballard-margaret-harte-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.