Dietitians' barriers and enablers to pro-environmental action fall into three themes: personal, social and professional, and contextual and environmental factors¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2031: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Thematic analysis of free-text survey responses identified 'personal', 'social and professional' and 'contextual and environmental' factors as barriers and enablers to pro-environmental action. → MacKenzie‐Shalders 2026
Evidence¶
MacKenzie‐Shalders 2026¶
MacKenzie‐Shalders, K. L., McCormack, J., Senior, N. M., & Barbour, L. (2026). From Beliefs to Action: Dietitians' Perspectives on Environmental Sustainability and a Pathway to Planetary Health Framework for Food System Change. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics. https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.70351
q2 · i? · design · r2
Qualitative thematic analysis (Braun and Clarke's six steps) of free-text barrier and enabler survey responses from workshop participants, analysed deductively with peer debriefing. Personal factors included knowledge, motivation, time and self-belief; contextual factors included infrastructure and policies.
"The thematic analysis of survey responses regarding barriers and enablers to pro‐environmental change resulted in three key themes: 'personal', 'social and professional' and 'contextual and environmental' factors, as summarised in Figure 2."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- A half-day workshop featuring the PPH framework significantly increased dietitians' confidence to undertake pro-environmental change in their personal and professional lives — related
- Belief that a global environmental problem needs addressing was already high before the workshop and did not significantly change — related
- Barriers to situated learning fall into three categories: the traditional school system, the traditional educational approach, and teacher training and practice — related
- Adult language learners join classes with varied, overlapping motivations that fall into goal-, activity- and learning-orientated categories — related
- Global change instruction poses a distinctive challenge: learners must view global change holistically while analysing individual issues at local and regional levels — related
- The most cited barriers to adult learning are situational, but adults also face internal barriers such as low confidence in their ability to learn — related
- Interviewed teachers attributed disengagement to technical, institutional, and social-relational environmental constraints rather than capability deficits — related
- Students' differing values about a campus predator-prey problem produced no agreed definition of the issue and no agreed action — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
three-themes-barriers-enablers-pro-environmental-dietitians |
title |
Dietitians' barriers and enablers to pro-environmental action fall into three themes: personal, social and professional, and contextual and environmental factors |
description |
Dietitians' barriers and enablers to pro-environmental action fall into three themes: personal, social and professional, and contextual and environmental factors |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
recheck_by |
2031 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-25 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — mackenzieshalders-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.