The DIGISOC questionnaire shows acceptable validity and reliability, including CFA data and favorable Cronbach's alpha coefficients¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · checked against its sources 2026-10-28 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The developed instrument obtained acceptable scientific guarantees, with confirmatory factor analysis data and favorable reliability coefficients using Cronbach's alpha. → Peart 2020
Evidence¶
Peart 2020¶
Peart, M., Gutiérrez-Esteban, P., and Cubo-Delgado, S. (2020). Development of the digital and socio-civic skills (DIGISOC) questionnaire. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, pp. 3327-3351. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11423-020-09824-Y
q2 · i? · design · r2
Instrument development study reporting the validation outcome: the authors state they "have obtained an instrument in English and Spanish with acceptable scientific guarantees" supported by CFA data and favorable Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficients. No specific coefficients are printed in the available text.
"We have obtained an instrument in English and Spanish with acceptable scientific guarantees; including statistical data regarding a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and favorable reliability coefficients using cronbach’s alpha."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Behavioural, cognitive and conceptual-to-consequential subscales of the QCGE-SAS show acceptable reliability, while the social engagement subscale shows unacceptable internal consistency — related
- The TQsrl and SQsrl questionnaires are validated instruments measuring SRL sub-processes with emphasis on reflection — related
- A confirmatory factor analysis on a new sample confirms the three-factor structure with acceptable model fit and moderate convergent validity — related
- The post-interaction reflection instrument showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .863) — related
- The MAKQ dimensions show acceptable internal consistency across both studies (alphas 0.77-0.93) — related
- TAILS dimensions show high internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha values above 0.90 — related
- Existing online SRL questionnaires show reliability problems, with most having at least one scale outside the acceptable Cronbach's alpha range — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
digisoc-acceptable-validity-reliability |
title |
The DIGISOC questionnaire shows acceptable validity and reliability, including CFA data and favorable Cronbach's alpha coefficients |
description |
The DIGISOC questionnaire shows acceptable validity and reliability, including CFA data and favorable Cronbach's alpha coefficients |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
source_checked |
2026-10-28 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — peart-2020 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.